Scripps climate researcher Richard Somerville was among 38 of the world’s most prominent climate scientists who signed a letter to the editor of the Wall Street Journal today rebutting a Jan. 27 op-ed entitled “No Need to Panic About Global Warming.”
“When the Wall Street Journal published a ridiculous op-ed, opposing the central findings of modern climate science, and repeating familiar falsehoods, signed by 16 people with little or no credibility in the field, then a group of mainstream climate scientists decided we simply had to set the record straight,” Somerville said.

Coverage of the letter from the New York Times here, the Guardian (U.K.) here, BoingBoing here, Huffington Post here, and ThinkProgress here

Further coverage on the response to the letter came from the New York TimesThe Daily Climate and Forbes.

The text of the letter follows:

Check With Climate Scientists for Views on Climate

Do you consult your dentist about your heart condition? In science, as in any area, reputations are based on knowledge and expertise in a field and on published, peer-reviewed work. If you need surgery, you want a highly experienced expert in the field who has done a large number of the proposed operations.

You published “No Need to Panic About Global Warming” (op-ed, Jan. 27) on climate change by the climate-science equivalent of dentists practicing cardiology. While accomplished in their own fields, most of these authors have no expertise in climate science. The few authors who have such expertise are known to have extreme views that are out of step with nearly every other climate expert. This happens in nearly every field of science. For example, there is a retrovirus expert who does not accept that HIV causes AIDS. And it is instructive to recall that a few scientists continued to state that smoking did not cause cancer, long after that was settled science.

Climate experts know that the long-term warming trend has not abated in the past decade. In fact, it was the warmest decade on record. Observations show unequivocally that our planet is getting hotter. And computer models have recently shown that during periods when there is a smaller increase of surface temperatures, warming is occurring elsewhere in the climate system, typically in the deep ocean. Such periods are a relatively common climate phenomenon, are consistent with our physical understanding of how the climate system works, and certainly do not invalidate our understanding of human-induced warming or the models used to simulate that warming.

Thus, climate experts also know what one of us, Kevin Trenberth, actually meant by the out-of-context, misrepresented quote used in the op-ed. Mr. Trenberth was lamenting the inadequacy of observing systems to fully monitor warming trends in the deep ocean and other aspects of the short-term variations that always occur, together with the long-term human-induced warming trend.

The National Academy of Sciences of the U.S. (set up by President Abraham Lincoln to advise on scientific issues), as well as major national academies of science around the world and every other authoritative body of scientists active in climate research have stated that the science is clear: The world is heating up and humans are primarily responsible. Impacts are already apparent and will increase. Reducing future impacts will require significant reductions in emissions of heat-trapping gases.

Research shows that more than 97% of scientists actively publishing in the field agree that climate change is real and human caused. It would be an act of recklessness for any political leader to disregard the weight of evidence and ignore the enormous risks that climate change clearly poses. In addition, there is very clear evidence that investing in the transition to a low-carbon economy will not only allow the world to avoid the worst risks of climate change, but could also drive decades of economic growth. Just what the doctor ordered.

Kevin Trenberth, Sc.D.

Distinguished Senior Scientist

Climate Analysis Section National Center for Atmospheric Research


Kevin Trenberth, Sc.D, Distinguished Senior Scientist, Climate Analysis Section, National Center for Atmospheric Research

Richard Somerville, Ph.D., Distinguished Professor, Scripps Institution of Oceanography, University of California, San Diego

Katharine Hayhoe, Ph.D., Director, Climate Science Center, Texas Tech University

Rasmus Benestad, Ph.D., Senior Scientist, The Norwegian Meteorological Institute

Gerald Meehl, Ph.D., Senior Scientist, Climate and Global Dynamics Division, National Center for Atmospheric Research

Michael Oppenheimer, Ph.D., Professor of Geosciences; Director, Program in Science, Technology and Environmental Policy, Princeton University

Peter Gleick, Ph.D., co-founder and president, Pacific Institute for Studies in Development, Environment, and Security

Michael C. MacCracken, Ph.D., Chief Scientist, Climate Institute, Washington

Michael Mann, Ph.D., Director, Earth System Science Center, Pennsylvania State University

Steven Running, Ph.D., Professor, Director, Numerical Terradynamic Simulation Group, University of Montana

Robert Corell, Ph.D., Chair, Arctic Climate Impact Assessment; Principal, Global Environment Technology Foundation

Dennis Ojima, Ph.D., Professor, Senior Research Scientist, and Head of the Dept. of Interior’s Climate Science Center at Colorado State University

Josh Willis, Ph.D., Climate Scientist, NASA’s Jet Propulsion Laboratory

Matthew England, Ph.D., Professor, Joint Director of the Climate Change Research Centre, University of New South Wales, Australia

Ken Caldeira, Ph.D., Atmospheric Scientist, Dept. of Global Ecology, Carnegie Institution

Warren Washington, Ph.D., Senior Scientist, National Center for Atmospheric Research

Terry L. Root, Ph.D., Senior Fellow, Woods Institute for the Environment, Stanford University

David Karoly, Ph.D., ARC Federation Fellow and Professor, University of Melbourne, Australia

Jeffrey Kiehl, Ph.D., Senior Scientist, Climate and Global Dynamics Division, National Center for Atmospheric Research

Donald Wuebbles, Ph.D., Professor of Atmospheric Sciences, University of Illinois

Camille Parmesan, Ph.D., Professor of Biology, University of Texas; Professor of Global Change Biology, Marine Institute, University of Plymouth, UK

Simon Donner, Ph.D., Assistant Professor, Department of Geography, University of British Columbia, Canada

Barrett N. Rock, Ph.D., Professor, Complex Systems Research Center and Department of Natural Resources, University of New Hampshire

David Griggs, Ph.D., Professor and Director, Monash Sustainability Institute, Monash University, Australia

Roger N. Jones, Ph.D., Professor, Professorial Research Fellow, Centre for Strategic Economic Studies, Victoria University, Australia

William L. Chameides, Ph.D., Dean and Professor, School of the Environment, Duke University

Gary Yohe, Ph.D., Professor, Economics and Environmental Studies, Wesleyan University, CT

Robert Watson, Ph.D., Chief Scientific Advisor to the UK Department of Environment, Food and Rural Affairs; Chair of Environmental Sciences, University of East Anglia

Steven Sherwood, Ph.D., Director, Climate Change Research Centre, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia

Chris Rapley, Ph.D., Professor of Climate Science, University College London, UK

Joan Kleypas, Ph.D., Scientist, Climate and Global Dynamics Division, National Center for Atmospheric Research

James J. McCarthy, Ph.D., Professor of Biological Oceanography, Harvard University

Stefan Rahmstorf, Ph.D., Professor of Physics of the Oceans, Potsdam University, Germany

Julia Cole, Ph.D., Professor, Geosciences and Atmospheric Sciences, University of Arizona

William H. Schlesinger, Ph.D., President, Cary Institute of Ecosystem Studies

Jonathan Overpeck, Ph.D., Professor of Geosciences and Atmospheric Sciences, University of Arizona

Eric Rignot, Ph.D., Senior Research Scientist, NASA’s Jet Propulsion Laboratory; Professor of Earth System Science, University of California, Irvine

Wolfgang Cramer, Professor of Global Ecology, Mediterranean Institute for Biodiversity and Ecology, CNRS, Aix-en-Provence, France

– Robert Monroe

5 Responses to In the News Now: 38 Climate Researchers Respond to a Wall Street Journal Opinion Piece

  1. Touraj says:

    What bothers me is the way that this letter is written. The wording insists that if you are not a scientist or expert in what you are talking about, you should just shut up. No Mr. Somerville, I strongly believe that everybody is free and has the right to express their opinion even if it is wrong, wrong, and wrong. Nobody has the right to stop them or try to put them down. This is where dictatorship starts.
    In this letter, I wasn’t able to find any reason for global warming other than human. Have you ever been able to figure out why all those politicians who support this idea and keep fighting for it move around using several SUVs? The vehicle that use of one of them by a regular family is a big crime. These changes have happened before and will happen again, with or without human so be kind to each other. Nobody is going to live forever.
    P. S. Galileo was the only one with the right idea against not 97%, but 100%. Who knows what is next.

  2. R. Wright says:

    “The interpretation of the observational science has been consistently over-egged to produce alarm. All real-world data over the past 20 years has shown the climate models to be exaggerating the likely impacts — if the models cannot account for the near term, why should I trust them in the long term?” Dr. Michael Kelly of Cambridge, England.

    The observational science at SIO is the Scripps Pier data, which along with that of other California tide stations, has shown a decline in average sea level over the past decade compared to the decade of the 1990s.

    Dr. Peter Gleick, one of the 38 who signed with Dr. Somerville, has insisted that the start of the 21st Century would bring unprecedented and accelerating sea level rise to the California coast.

    Yet the low areas of South Mission Beach, which were often threatened with flooding during the 1990s, now find flooding a rare event. And the Marine Room restaurant near SIO, built in 1941 at sea level, still remains open for business. Dr. Kelly’s point is a powerful one. Some climate scientists have exaggerated to provoke alarm. And locally, scientists like Dr. Gleick have ignored the sea level data when it conflicts with the alarming forecasts from computer models.

  3. Fuzz says:

    No, jumbella, saying that there is evidence that something could happen is not the same as disputing the conclusions of 97% of the scientific community. If 97% of economists said that this “could NOT drive decades of economic growth” and then these folks made a statement to the effect that all of those economists are wrong and we should listen to them instead, you would have an analogous situation.

  4. jumbeliah says:

    The letter begins with a statement that dentist are unqualified for some medical procedures. It concludes with an implication that climate scientists are qualified in the field of economic prediction. I wouldn’t endorse that letter no matter where I stood on the global warming issue.

  5. Michele Waldman says:

    Of course, change would mean that all those FAT CATS in D.C. would have to give up their handsome profits from the oil industry and chemical industry.

    I don’t think that’s going to happen as fast as we’d all like it to happen. The Tea Party folks are into growing the economy, not profiting from big oil on wall street.

scripps oceanography uc san diego