Horizontal banding of ice layers reveals thousands of years of ice
formation at Greenland's Pakitsoq ice margin. Geoscientists frequent
Greenland's ice sheets to build records of paleoclimate.
Ancient Methane Burst: More Slow Hiss than Big Burp
Scripps-led study suggests wetland growth rather than widespread melt-off caused methane release 12,000 years ago
Some 11,600 years ago, one geological period gave way to another in
dramatic fashion. As the last glacial period ended, Greenland, for
example, experienced a 10* C (18° F) temperature increase over a
20-year stretch.
And levels of methane, a gas highly efficient at warming the
atmosphere, began to spike as well, increasing by about 50 percent
in fewer than two centuries.
For years, that occurrence has been a source of concern for
scientists. What if, some wondered, it had been caused by a
catastrophic melt of the stores of methane frozen in Arctic
permafrost or encased at the bottom of the sea? What if that meant
such a giant "burp" could happen again in the midst of the planet's
current warming trend? A sudden influx of methane into the
atmosphere would accelerate the greenhouse effect to an extent that
could exceed the worst-case climate change scenarios for the next
century envisioned by scientists.
But a finding published last month by a team led by Scripps
Institution of Oceanography at UC San Diego could allay those fears.
An expansion of wetlands and not a large-scale melting of frozen
methane deposits appears to be behind the spike.
The finding is expected to come as a relief to climate watchers
concerned that a huge acceleration of global warming might have been
touched off by the melting of solid methane deposits called
clathrates. In addition to what a repeat of that event would mean
for current global warming trends, some evidence suggests the
worldwide melting of methane triggered continental shelf collapses
as undersea structures became unstable.

Vasilii Petrenko, then a Scripps graduate student in the laboratory
of Scripps geoscientist Jeff Severinghaus, led a multi-year analysis
of ice from the vast ice sheets of Greenland. With an international
team of researchers, he measured the amount of carbon-14 isotopes in
methane from air bubbles trapped in glacial ice and determined that
the methane spike was more chemically consistent with an expansion
of wetlands than a meltdown. Wetland regions, which produce large
amounts of methane from bacterial breakdown of organic matter, are
known to have spread during prehistoric warming trends.
"This is good news for global warming because it suggests that
methane clathrates do not respond to warming by releasing large
amounts of methane into the atmosphere," said Petrenko, now a
postdoctoral fellow at University of Colorado, Boulder.
Vast stores of methane clathrate exist in seafloor deposits and in
permafrost. Cold temperatures and the intense pressure of the deep
ocean stabilize these masses and keep methane from entering the
atmosphere. Scientists have estimated that a melting of only 10
percent of the world's clathrate deposits would create a greenhouse
effect equal to a tenfold increase in the amount of carbon dioxide
in the atmosphere. For comparison, the warming trend observed in the
last century has taken place with only a 30 percent increase of
atmospheric carbon dioxide.
The research team collected what may be the largest ice samples ever
for a climate change study. The researchers cut away 15 tons of ice
from a site called Pakitsoq at the western margin of the Greenland
ice sheet to collect the ancient air trapped within. Methane exists
in low concentrations in this air and only a trillionth of any given
amount contains the carbon-14 isotope that the researchers needed to
perform the analysis. Levels of carbon-14, which has a half-life of
5,730 years, were too high in the methane to have come from
clathrates, the researchers concluded.

"This study is important because it confirms that wetlands and
moisture availability change dramatically along with abrupt climate
change," said Severinghaus. "This highlights in a general way the
fact that the largest impacts of future climate change may be on
water resources and drought, rather than temperature per se."
The results appear in April 24 editions of the journal Science. In
addition to Petrenko and Severinghaus, researchers from the
Australian Nuclear Science and Technology Organisation (ANSTO),
Oregon State University, the National Institute of Water and
Atmospheric Research in New Zealand, the Technical University of
Denmark and the Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research
Organisation in Australia contributed to the report.
—Robert Monroe
May 2009
|